Hardcore Sledder banner

Switchback question....Assault or XC?

17K views 45 replies 21 participants last post by  Cousin Eddie  
#1 ·
I ride about 50 / 50 on /off trail....which 146 skid would be better?
Xc has pro cc....assault has igx.
 
#2 ·
I ride about 50 / 50 on /off trail....which 146 skid would be better?
Xc has pro cc....assault has igx.
Both the Switchback Assault 146" and the Switchback XC 146" have the IGX rear skid, difference being shocks, Walker evans VS Fox QS3, and rail supports, and the 7S, The Indy XC has the 137" Pro CC rear skid with Fox QS3 shocks. But if your a 50/50 get either one of the Switchbacks, my vote is the Assault 146" for the extra goodies.
 
#7 ·
The marketing is strong with Polaris, they either get you with the 7s or the 850
I looked at both the assault and the xc and I don't see any reason to go xc if you can S/C because your shock package, 7s and paint.
And you can get the 1.5 Storm track if you want but you pay for it.
 
#9 ·
I currently have both the XC 146 and an Assault. The Assault is new and I haven’t got to drive it yet but I spent a season on the XC and love that sled, the QS3 shocks are great, far better then the walkers the older Assaults had. I have no complaints with the XC 146. I put the softer rear springs in it even though I’m 200lbs without gear and it’s rides about the same as a 22 XCR but I didn’t fiddle with the XCR suspension too much.. Im not sure what the current price difference is with equal gauges but I don’t think I would pay much more for an Assault. If the snow holds out I might get some miles on the Assault and see how that goes.
 
#10 ·
Battle what track did you go with on your the XC and the new Assault. And yes I'm not saying the XC is not a good choice as Battle has stated I was making a opinion based on track options, and I like track options.

I am most likely going with a XC or Assault in Snow Check 25 so it will be good to see what Battle has to say about the walker shocks compared to the QS3
 
#22 ·
Anybody that got and kept their 22 enjoyed the last year of the 4 year warranty. Saved a couple dollars too.
But they got crappy inconsistently built fuel pump assembly's and shit easily plugged fuel socks. The 22's were built in the begining of the very real era of Supply Chain problems.
Shocks, Gauges, Tracks, Fuel System delivery issues, Cheap Cables that snap or stretch easily.... Just naming a few. ;)
I'm enjoying my 2022 as well as I've worked around some of the 2022 shortfalls. Still happy I kept it just the same but the 22's hold no big bragging rights in my book. My 2021 has been flawless.
 
#26 ·
That's subjective. I'm happy with the Walker Evans. I did upgrade to a 2" XCR rts with hi/lo. The only one I'm going to mess with before next season is the front track shock.

I have the Fox QS3s on my adventure 137. It's a much more plush ride. Position 3 is too stiff, position 2 is ok for cruising average trail junk.
Of course valving changes would help. They are by no means a bad shock. The assault calibration may be better.

The walkers at least I can add a couple clicks without going full stiff.
 
#25 ·
It’s safe to say owner investment in care while owning/ riding it and after season attention of critical areas have a lot to do with any report card on a sled. I honestly can say after many sleds in my time I’ve never owed a bad sled but I’ve made sure it was taking care of and ready each season. My new22 Polaris took me back to my all AC days when the new sled came home it was gone through front to back and ready as possible. Any know issues that where real was taking care of up front.
 
#27 ·
My 22 has also been trouble free, as have my 19,21 and 23. First thing I do is drop a Fitch fuel catalyst in the tank. Knock on wood, not a single fuel issue in any of them. None have been updated either. As many have stated, I also am not a turn the key and hope for the best type. My sleds get a thorough once over after picking up from dealer. Season is way to short to have down time.
 
#28 ·
As for the shocks, I don’t have anything with q3’s so only comparison I can give is on customer’s sleds in for service. If you are a set it and forget it type that rides same type of trails the fox are a good simple shock. If you very the type of trail you ride and how hard you ride the walkers are superior. I too went to a 2” hi/lo rts and added hi/lo adjusters all the way around. But I did my own valving. The valving in the clickers themselves can be changed also for even more customization.
 
#41 · (Edited)
Switchback Assault also has Rail Braces, 4 rear idlers and a larger choice of tracks at SnowCheck
1.35 Cobra
1.5 Ice Storm
1.6 Cobra
2.0 Crossover

Switchback XC has 3 rear idlers and a track choice of:
1.35 Cobra
1.6 Cobra
 
#42 ·
Never ridden with the QS3’s but sounds like there’s really only 2 usable setups on the 3 click adjustment since 1 setting seems to be rock hard. If you’re thinking you can always revalve to make the settings more usable then the $300 up charge to the Assault is a no-brainer IMO; arguably much better shocks, rail stiffeners, extra bogie wheels and better resale value just because of the name. Different strokes for different folks and that’s why they offer different models. Now if the QS3R Kashima shocks were on the table then it could be a different comparison but… I wonder if the oem spec’d QS3 rides anywhere near as good as a well built Velocity - talking normal real world riding not Levi fly high style riding… a properly factory spec’d Velocity is pretty amazing so that alone is worth it to me… just my $.02