Hardcore Sledder banner

Procross turbo vs doo xr 1200

4.7K views 25 replies 12 participants last post by  Tommcat  
#1 · (Edited)
I have had numerous PMs and people asking me to post up what i thought of the doo compared to my procross. I finally logged some serious miles this weekend and feel that i got a good feeling for the doo. So here it is:

Power: obviously the cat has a lot more power. the power of the doo is impressive though. I am pretty certain that the 0-60 is faster on the doo. The 60-100 on the doo isnt even in the same realm as the cat. I did miss the power of the cat on the grade a couple times. Not so much the top speed, because i can live with 100 mph, but the cruising at 80 mph and then mashing it will be missed.

Sound: when i first heard the cats, i hated the sound. However, after riding one, i really liked it. The sound of the turbo blowoff and the subtle whistle were never tiring for me. The same cannot be said for the doo. I think it sounds annoying. It sounds like a treadmill. Perhaps the reason is because there is so little actual exhaust noise, that it makes the engine noises louder? Not sure. Either way, i was tired of hearing it whine away by the end of the almost 400 miles i logged.

Engine braking: when letting off the throttle on the doo, the sled really slows down fast. I mean, really slows down really fast! I got used to it, but in all honesty, when just out cruising, not riding hard, i bet you could remove the brake lever all together. The cat did have some slowdown, but it wasnt as severe. One really isnt better than the other. You get used to it and learn to use it to your advantage while riding.

Ride: the doo rides very very nice. What i mean by that is everything about it, just seems a little more rider friendly than the cat. When sitting on the doo, your feet or a little bit farther out in front. You are able to really tuck your feet up in the sled, which feels good. Also, it seems like the handlebars are closer to the rider. I always felt like i was "reaching" for the bars on the procross. The doo feels much more natural. The seat is way softer than the procross, but it could be a little higher. I am going to install the x package seat to cure that. I had a 6 inch riser put on, but should have went bigger. When turning, the bars hit my legs and i gotta kick my leg out vs tuck it tight against the sled like i could on the procross. A larger riser and putting it more vertical will help that.

I didnt really notice any clear advantage of the longer track on the gade. There was a ton of snow and i probably wouldnt have made it through my yard with the cat, but on the trail...not sure, maybe a little.

I put the USI skis from my cat onto the doo. The steering effort on my cat was pretty bad. On the doo.....pretty close to as bad. Maybe a little lighter, but, my arms and shoulders are feeling it today. I think part of the reason for this on both sled, besides ski design, is the engine braking. When letting off the throttle on both the cat and the doo, the engine braking will cause more ski pressure. Gotta experiment with the steering thing.

Handling: i cannot completely fairly compare the handling. I have a base adrenaline, and i had a snopro procross. The doo, when driving aggressively through not so nice stuff, feels slow. I dont mean slow like in mph. I mean slow as in, slow to respond to the terrain. The procross, probably mostly due to the better shocks, was more "ready" for the next bump. When riding the cat aggressively, you find out why the sled doesnt "ride" as nice. The subtle differences that are a nuisance when out cruising quickly turn into God sends when you are ready to "give er" on some less than smooth trails. One of the biggest examples....the sitting to standing transition is much easier on the cat. To do that transition seamlessly on the doo, i first had to pull my feet back.

Reliablity: everyone here knows of the problems with the cats, dont need to rehash that at this point. I now have 400 miles on the doo and my belt looks awesome, idlers look new, and slides are looking great. I used my reverse numerous times this weekend as well. The main reason for buying the doo was to be capable of doing big mileage trips and not having to worry about wrenching. It does that well. Never missed a beat all weekend.

Misc: the handguards on the doo are nicer and they actually work. I very rarely had to use my warmers. Part of that might be the windshield as well. The seat is much stickier, which is good and bad. Good for when cruising or on the gradual high speed turns. Bad when you get to the rough stuff and want to give the sled some body english. It is hard to just slide over side to side.


So there it is. Which one is better in my opinion? Neither. They both so certain things better than the other. i will have to decide this spring whether to upgrade the renegade or leave stock and hope that cat has the procross dialed in by 2014. Will have to figure out if it is more cost effective to throw parts at the doo, or just wait.
 
#2 ·
Nice comparison and I agree with the shocks if I was to get a new one it will be a X for the seat and shocks. Thats why I put the Fox Zeros in the skid and the Float 2's on the front. :bc2:
 
#6 ·
Having owned a 1200 for a few years now, I have to say it is one of the best trail sleds I've owned. The downside is the power, it is an overachiever for what it is, but it's still a 140 hp sled. Now I'm hoping my first cat I'm going to order is close to the handling and issue free of the Doo, because it will be the best of both worlds.
 
#9 ·
Running the USI triple threats currently on my cat, Ive spent LOTS of testing time making them turn as easily as possible.

Heres my setup: Im running 3,s up front and 2,s in back, make sure your using the farthest rearward mounting hole(ski forward) and cut off the runner just past 2nd to last hole at an anlgle so it doesnt catch on anything backing up. Not using the last bolt hole also works on stock cat ski to make it turn easier, effictively your putting more turning in front of the spindle which makes it turn easier.
 
#10 ·
Here's my review of the two:

Power: The Cat has power in Spades once I added the JDP four-stage tune. Very fast! Outran everything in site! Ended up being just the flagman again with the turbo Cat. My 1200 has the PB80 on it along with a MBRP header and outruns most everything in the 800 class other than my friends CFR800 this season. I'm right in the thick of things with the 1200 and it’s a blast racing and not being the flagman.

Doo throttle is touchy and has instant response; Cat is not as responsive in RPM but makes up for it in Torque acceleration. Cat has truck like power delivery and torque; Doo has explosive power delivery and RPM.

Sound: Well the Cat is a twin and it does not sound great or even good. The 1200's a triple and sounds much better, but not as good as a four-cylinder Yamaha. Any aftermarket exhaust on the Cat and its too loud. Stock noise level on the Cat is fine but what’s with all the blow off valve noise and whistles? That gets a little annoying after a long day.

Engine braking: I like to ride aggressive and use as much engine braking as I can get to my advantage. The 1200 is good, but I'd like more engine braking, I like the old Yamaha's WITHOUT ENGINE BRAKING REDUCTION SYSTEM! With the Cat turbo I'm always having to use the brakes and at times It needs pumping because for some reason the pads get pushed back even though the disc is not warped. The Cat needs lots more engine braking and better brakes!

Ride: The Cat rides good but tends to crash thru its travel easier, I think the Cat is a falling rate suspension in how it feels compared to the SC-5 in my 1200 Gade. The Doo never bottoms and rides plush thru the stutters. I think the Cat has a stronger front end on it compared to the Doo. And perhaps a better ride up front, but the slop in the steering on the Cat is unacceptable to me. The Doo has no slop even with a bunch of miles on.

Ergos: Doo seat is better and wider, more comfortable. Cat seat seems lower with less padding; std. seat heat is nice however.

Cat is very warm on the feet; Doo is just right with heat output, not too hot and not too cold.

I like the longer 137" track on my Gade too. 128" is too short, and the 141" with single ply is too long.

I like the easier steering on the Cat compared to the Doo, but wont give up the razor sharp handling of the Doo.

Handling: Hands down goes to the Doo, I can rail thru the corners faster than the Cat and feel much more in control on the Doo. The Cat when pushed hard either pushes or tips. The Cat is heavy and it shows. Feels to me to be too much weight up top on the Cat. Wears me out riding the Cat fast and hard on the trail. Doo is the light, nimble handling, and featherweight four-stroke. The Doo has more room to move around and transfer weigh from one side to the other. The Cat seems to be confined and leaves me locked into one position.

Reliability: Goes to the Doo, never a concern even with all the miles I have on it. Original slides, wheels and I don't worry about chain, shafts, gears, fuel delivery, clutches suspension or anything, just laugh and smile.

My turbo went thru two broken sway bar bushings; one set of slides and blew three wheels the first five hundred miles. Chain and gears were always in the back of my mind but no reverse issues yet. Always seems like something bad could happen at anytime with the Cat. The Cat is not well built or engineered! No excuse for using sheet metal screws everywhere! They even hold the hood on with them? Really? Do I even mention the clutch guard or lack of one, and then to mount the electronics to the flimsy thing? Nice!

I like the Doo chassis, handling and ride better. Much more comfortable on the Doo. 150HP is just a few items away. Header & RB3. Damn close to a perfect sled!

I like the power of the Cat better with the JDP tune in it. Wish that Cat had engine braking, better ride and handling, more room to move around on the sled and a three or four cylinder in it. A long ways to go to be close to perfect. Not sure it can be done with this engine, chassis and suspension.
 
G
#11 ·
Here's my review of the two:

Power: The Cat has power in Spades once I added the JDP four-stage tune. Very fast! Outran everything in site! Ended up being just the flagman again with the turbo Cat. My 1200 has the PB80 on it along with a MBRP header and outruns most everything in the 800 class other than my friends CFR800 this season. I'm right in the thick of things with the 1200 and it’s a blast racing and not being the flagman.

Doo throttle is touchy and has instant response; Cat is not as responsive in RPM but makes up for it in Torque acceleration. Cat has truck like power delivery and torque; Doo has explosive power delivery and RPM.

Sound: Well the Cat is a twin and it does not sound great or even good. The 1200's a triple and sounds much better, but not as good as a four-cylinder Yamaha. Any aftermarket exhaust on the Cat and its too loud. Stock noise level on the Cat is fine but what’s with all the blow off valve noise and whistles? That gets a little annoying after a long day.

Engine braking: I like to ride aggressive and use as much engine braking as I can get to my advantage. The 1200 is good, but I'd like more engine braking, I like the old Yamaha's WITHOUT ENGINE BRAKING REDUCTION SYSTEM! With the Cat turbo I'm always having to use the brakes and at times It needs pumping because for some reason the pads get pushed back even though the disc is not warped. The Cat needs lots more engine braking and better brakes!

Ride: The Cat rides good but tends to crash thru its travel easier, I think the Cat is a falling rate suspension in how it feels compared to the SC-5 in my 1200 Gade. The Doo never bottoms and rides plush thru the stutters. I think the Cat has a stronger front end on it compared to the Doo. And perhaps a better ride up front, but the slop in the steering on the Cat is unacceptable to me. The Doo has no slop even with a bunch of miles on.

Ergos: Doo seat is better and wider, more comfortable. Cat seat seems lower with less padding; std. seat heat is nice however.

Cat is very warm on the feet; Doo is just right with heat output, not too hot and not too cold.

I like the longer 137" track on my Gade too. 128" is too short, and the 141" with single ply is too long.

I like the easier steering on the Cat compared to the Doo, but wont give up the razor sharp handling of the Doo.

Handling: Hands down goes to the Doo, I can rail thru the corners faster than the Cat and feel much more in control on the Doo. The Cat when pushed hard either pushes or tips. The Cat is heavy and it shows. Feels to me to be too much weight up top on the Cat. Wears me out riding the Cat fast and hard on the trail. Doo is the light, nimble handling, and featherweight four-stroke. The Doo has more room to move around and transfer weigh from one side to the other. The Cat seems to be confined and leaves me locked into one position.

Reliability: Goes to the Doo, never a concern even with all the miles I have on it. Original slides, wheels and I don't worry about chain, shafts, gears, fuel delivery, clutches suspension or anything, just laugh and smile.

My turbo went thru two broken sway bar bushings; one set of slides and blew three wheels the first five hundred miles. Chain and gears were always in the back of my mind but no reverse issues yet. Always seems like something bad could happen at anytime with the Cat. The Cat is not well built or engineered! No excuse for using sheet metal screws everywhere! They even hold the hood on with them? Really? Do I even mention the clutch guard or lack of one, and then to mount the electronics to the flimsy thing? Nice!

I like the Doo chassis, handling and ride better. Much more comfortable on the Doo. 150HP is just a few items away. Header & RB3. Damn close to a perfect sled!

I like the power of the Cat better with the JDP tune in it. Wish that Cat had engine braking, better ride and handling, more room to move around on the sled and a three or four cylinder in it. A long ways to go to be close to perfect. Not sure it can be done with this engine, chassis and suspension.
pretty much opposite what the op said...
 
This post has been deleted
#20 ·
another thread reminded me of something.

The headlights on the doo are a lot better. Nice to be able to have both the high and low beams pointing at the trail. I was able to dim my lights for oncoming sleds with ease. Wish cat would have went with a two bulb setup for the procross.
 
#21 ·
another thread reminded me of something.

The headlights on the doo are a lot better. Nice to be able to have both the high and low beams pointing at the trail. I was able to dim my lights for oncoming sleds with ease. Wish cat would have went with a two bulb setup for the procross.
are you saying that the procross only has one bulb? or just that it's got 2 but they are hi/lo bulbs instead of seperate high and low?