I have never seen any Video comparisons of Stopping, Accelerating or Cornering. I don't believe there are any?
I have used these on many different sleds and we have all read what many other people have said about them as well. I will point out my feeling of what to expect in comparison.
Real conventional push through studs will accelerate, stop and bite better in the corner in ALL situations. Not even an argument here.
I-Grips don't penetrate as well because they are installed at the tip of a rubber paddle that bends. I assumed this would be the case well before trying them.
I grips are WAY LIGHTER. You can fully I-Grip most tracks in most situations with only about 1 pound of studs.
Regular Conventional studs are WAY HEAVIER. Beafy Studs, Beafy Backers and Beafy Nuts will likely have 10X more rotating mass weight depending on stud length, Backer style and Nut size.
If your a guy that lives for straight line racing and strong take offs and usually put tall studs and or more than 2 studs per row you will be totally disappointed with I-Grips. "Don't even try them"
If you are a guy that studs only 2 per row and uses recommended stud lengths that aren't overly aggressive and does this for safety instead of racing performance you may be satisfied with I-Grips?
Let's face it there's a lot of riders out there that don't like using any studs at all so there's many different kinds of riding preferences out there.
I don't straight line race. I like light studding for safety. I prefer a little looseness in the rear but riding stud less all together is a bit nerve wracking for me in icy conditions.
I like the way I-Grips weigh next to nothing. I like the looseness and little drift I can get in the corner. I like not pushing into corners from over studding. I like a little added safety. "I like I-Grips"
Realizing the short falls in comparison aren't a negative for me and my type of riding.