Hardcore Sledder banner
1 - 9 of 9 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
1,791 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Has anyone used Cutler Performance's Quickshift clutch weights? They are supposed to have a different profile designed to allow the drive clutch to shift up faster. They claim,"The secret is in the cam arm profile. When matched with the correct weight and spring combination it will out accelerate your current clutch set up"

They also say that you need to run 3-4 grams less weight with their cam arm as opposed to your stock weights.

Has anyone used them to backup their claims?
 

· Banned
Joined
·
6,879 Posts
Originally posted by sixpack@Sep 27 2005, 05:46 PM
"The secret is in the cam arm profile. When matched with the correct weight and spring combination it will out accelerate your current clutch set up"

They also say that you need to run 3-4 grams less weight with their cam arm as opposed to your stock weights.


<div align="right">index.php?act=findpost&pid=895854
[/quote]
all of above is true pretty much, haven;t used THEIRS, but tried same principle a few yrs ago and worked awesome, the ''secret'' is their profile allows more aggressive pressure to ''push MORE directly near the original point of weight to roller contact'', thereby allowing more belt side pressure, get your hands on an HRP(hulings race products) cat from in the early to mid 90's and see the polaris spiders he had set up with ''adjustable rollers'', these allowed MORE weight to be concentrated on rollers sides similar to what cutlers profiles do just with a simple adjustment,,,,,,,,
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,791 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
Well, they claim the weights are a straight drop in. I was contemplating trying them. Only problem is, I also have a TEAM roller in my sled. Not sure if the combination will work together or not? Had a set of heavy hitter by thunder products and it was a nightmare trying to get some consistency between the 2 clutches. Ended up going back to a Polaris weight. One day setup ran well, next day....ran like crap. Always too light or too heavy. Not interested in spending some money on these weights and then having the same problems.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
6,879 Posts
Originally posted by sixpack@Sep 27 2005, 06:23 PM
Well, they claim the weights are a straight drop in.  I was contemplating trying them.  Only problem is, I also have a TEAM roller in my sled.  Not sure if the combination will work together or not?  Had a set of heavy hitter by thunder products and it was a nightmare trying to get some consistency between the 2 clutches.  Ended up going back to a Polaris weight.  One day setup ran well, next day....ran like crap.  Always too light or too heavy.  Not interested in spending some money on these weights and then having the same problems.
<div align="right">index.php?act=findpost&pid=895909
[/quote]
they are drop in, more than likely, you're''inconsistency'' was from secondary spring not being ccw(counter clockwise wound), this caused a lot of grief for tuners :dunno:
 

· Banned
Joined
·
6,879 Posts
Originally posted by sixpack@Sep 27 2005, 09:45 PM
Could be, but mine had a CCW spring in it.  Pretty shallow helix as well.  Drove me nuts....
<div align="right">index.php?act=findpost&pid=896363
[/quote]
how many miles on team?? worn bushings will bind and cause that also, seen a few 04's do that with around 2000 miles and ''zero maintenance''<<(not accusing you of that) :beerchug:
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,791 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7 ·
The Team clutch is pretty mint. I usually check out everything a few times a year. Will probably replace the spring this year - not because it needs it, but just because. I'm very fussy.

I don't know what to say, but when I had the heavy hitters in it in combination with the TEAM, the sled ran differently everyday depending on the terrain, temp, etc. I didn't know whether to blame the TEAM roller clutch or the weights. For a quick comparison, I threw in a set of Polaris weights and the problem went away. Much more consistent and forgiving. I have no doubt in my mind that for straightline racing, the heavy hitter would probably work better, but for the everyday trail rider, I was annoyed by how many times I had to make changes to the weights to get the sled to run consistently. One morning I thought I had it perfect. By the time the afternoon rolled around, the temp went up and the sled had a hard time pulling the weight. It was extremely frustrating. I spoke with TEAM directly and they told me to stick to a Polaris weight. That's what they test with, thats what they recommend. :dunno:
The TEAM cluth is so sensitive to changing conditions. It upshift very quickly and in combination with the hitters, it was too much or too little depending on what the secondary clutch was sensing.

My main concern is that I don't want to spend $100 on a set of Cutler's to have them sit in my toolbox.....only to sell them later for a big loss because they didn't work. I'd like to get a set to try, but the expense is a little steep for a "might work" scenario.....
 

· Banned
Joined
·
6,879 Posts
Originally posted by sixpack@Sep 28 2005, 10:57 AM
The Team clutch is pretty mint.  I usually check out everything a few times a year.  Will probably replace the spring this year - not because it needs it, but just because.  I'm very fussy.

I don't know what to say, but when I had the heavy hitters in it in combination with the TEAM, the sled ran differently everyday depending on the terrain, temp, etc.  I didn't know whether to blame the TEAM roller clutch or the weights.  For a quick comparison, I threw in a set of Polaris weights and the problem went away.  Much more consistent and forgiving.  I have no doubt in my mind that for straightline racing, the heavy hitter would probably work better, but for the everyday trail rider, I was annoyed by how many times I had to make changes to the weights to get the sled to run consistently.  One morning I thought I had it perfect.  By the time the afternoon rolled around, the temp went up and the sled had a hard time pulling the weight.  It was extremely frustrating.  I spoke with TEAM directly and they told me to stick to a Polaris weight.  That's what they test with, thats what they recommend.  :dunno:
The TEAM cluth is so sensitive to changing conditions.  It upshift very quickly and in combination with the hitters, it was too much or too little depending on what the secondary clutch was sensing. 

My main concern is that I don't want to spend $100 on a set of Cutler's to have them sit in my toolbox.....only to sell them later for a big loss because they didn't work.  I'd like to get a set to try, but the expense is a little steep for a "might work" scenario.....
<div align="right">index.php?act=findpost&pid=897118
[/quote]
i hear ya',,, if going for the ''max'', on straightline, usually that does end up biting you in the ass under varying conditions/terrain, for that you need an available bolt in weight set already tested for varying terr.conditions vs your straightline setup, no two ways to really get the best of both unfortunately,,
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,791 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 ·
Yeah, I know what you mean. I wish I knew someone that had a set of 60g cutlers that they would be willing to let me try. I'm tired of throwing money away....I doubt that Cutler performance would let me "try" a set either before buying them. LOL
 
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top