[danoptex]

I heard these tracks have changed in the last year and are a good choice in the 1-1/2" just wondering your thoughts, i was told the rubber is 70 durometer

 

[n2oiroc]

only thing i heard was it was too soft. a lot or them around with torn lugs. polaris sells a harder 1.5" as an accessory track.

 

[danoptex]

really? when i looked for a 121" i had a hard time finding one

 

[n2oiroc]

Originally posted by danoptex@Sep 22 2005, 05:49 AM
really? when i looked for a 121" i had a hard time finding  one
<div align="right">index.php?act=findpost&pid=886565

[/quote]
camo also makes a 1.5" 6 pitch hillcross track. very durable and agressive. also here is a link to polaris 121" tracks. dont worry about price. you can beat up the dealer and get $75-$100 taken off the price.http://www.purepolaris.com/Detail.aspx?Ite...arisPGACatalog)

 

[danoptex]

is this a hard track?? or for powder?

 

[n2oiroc]

Originally posted by danoptex@Sep 22 2005, 12:15 PM
is this a hard track?? or for powder?
<div align="right">index.php?act=findpost&pid=886988

[/quote]
i believe its both. its a powder design in a harder compound. i have a 136" x 1.75" polaris track i bought used for my viper and it is in great shape for coming off a 2000 rmk 700. i wouldnt hesitate getting a polaris 1.5" or a camoplast hillcross track. the harder compound works just as well and is a lot more durable than an intense.

 

[danoptex]

bruce from tracksusa was telling me that the hillcross and intense are virtually the same rubber?? He seemed disgruntled that i had concerns with the intense, he ranted about how nothing will hold up to the power people want to put through them??

 

[n2oiroc]

Originally posted by danoptex@Sep 22 2005, 09:19 PM
bruce from tracksusa was telling me that the hillcross and intense are virtually the same rubber?? He seemed disgruntled that i had concerns with the intense, he ranted about how nothing will hold up  to the power people want to put through them??
<div align="right">index.php?act=findpost&pid=887899

[/quote]
the hillcross might be close in compound, but its a much stiffer lug (no fingers or thin paddles to tear). i dont take what he says too seriously, he is a trail rider that sees no need for anything over a 1" lug. i have seen a LOT of intense tracks for sale with torn lugs. i wouldnt hesitate to get one for strictly off trail, but like i said before, they do not hold up on the trail.

 

[bonz50]

Originally posted by n2oiroc@Sep 22 2005, 08:35 PM
i believe its both. its a powder design in a harder compound. i have a 136" x 1.75" polaris track i bought used for my viper and it is in great shape for coming off a 2000 rmk 700. i wouldnt hesitate getting a polaris 1.5" or a camoplast hillcross track. the harder compound works just as well and is a lot more durable than an intense.
<div align="right">index.php?act=findpost&pid=887812

[/quote]
i've got the same 1.75 track on my pro-x, it has held up great even in horrible snow conditions we've had here in the midwest... i've even punched out the rest of the windows and "ported" the track with 2-1" holes between each lug... no problems