Getting a longer track sled? - HCS Snowmobile Forums

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-21-2016, 05:58 PM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 24
Current Sled(s): 07 500ss trail
Location: Northeast
16-17 Mileage: 2
Default Getting a longer track sled?

So I was thinking about upgrading to a longer track sled. With most manufacturers going to 129 as the standard size and some offer a 137 for trail sleds it has me wondering. How much snow can a 137 x 1.25 lug handle? Around here we get a rare blizzard which will drop 2 feet. I found out last year how easy it was to get stuck with a 121 x 1 inch lug. I realize there are other benefits when it comes to the longer track as the suspension will not beat you up as much on the smaller bumps. Seems like there is almost no reason to not get a 137 unless you don't have the space or ride really tight trails.
triptrip is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 12-21-2016, 07:15 PM   #2 (permalink)
Super Advanced Member
 
cire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,606
Current Sled(s): 19 assault 19 SKS
Previous Sled(s): never owned a polaris is a lie
Location: South Lyon MI
Favorite Riding Area: Elmira
Riding Since: 1969
Default

Even the 137 is really not noticed in most tight trials as it pivots under your feet any way. I ride a 162 and won't own anything less then a 153.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
MSA & ACSC member
cire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2016, 07:26 PM   #3 (permalink)
Super Advanced Member
 
JJ800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 174
Current Sled(s): Switchback pro R LE Retro
Previous Sled(s): FST LX
Location: Genoa City, WI
Favorite Riding Area: Upper Penninsula/Northern Wisc
19-20 Mileage:
18-19 Mileage: 2,000
16-17 Mileage: 300
Age: 44
Riding Since: 1990
Default

Definitely better all around much better in deep stuff, smoother ride on trail just a little more care needed with suspension setup to get proper handling.

I'm going to 1.75 track as I heard it's the optimum choice for both on and off trail

Make the jump you won't regret it
JJ800 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2016, 07:58 PM   #4 (permalink)
Super Advanced Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,240
Default

it will still be a short lug, but it will have a lot more lugs on the snow, and a lot better floatation. a 129 to a 137 might not be to noticeable. but if your going from 120 to a 137, it will be drastic, and you wont regret it!
tylera189 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2016, 09:54 PM   #5 (permalink)
AKA Ezra
 
ez ryder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,855
Current Sled(s): 14m8 15 gade6
Location: MN Lk Minnetonka
Favorite Riding Area: Alpine
19-20 Mileage:
18-19 Mileage: 700
Age: 47
Riding Since: 72
Default

remember 2up trail sleds have been 136 to 144 for ever . a 136 is just fine for most all trail. I have yet to ride with anyone who can pull away in tight trail on a 121 when I am on a 136.
your hook up off the line and breaking and straight tracking in soft snow will all be better on a 136.
2ft is really not much snow any 136 with a 1.6 will go anyplace in 2 ft unless u are trying to get stuck or are lazy.
there is a reason crossovers are a massive segment of sled sales .
just make sure when shopping if u are a trail guy to get a crossover with the coupled skid for trail not a uncoupled float off trail skid.

also there is no such thing as a true cross over sled they are a compromise and usually fall very short in the off trail segment

Last edited by ez ryder; 12-21-2016 at 09:57 PM.
ez ryder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2016, 09:34 AM   #6 (permalink)
Super Advanced Member
 
Peter King 28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,124
Current Sled(s): '17 Pro-S 800 SB, '16 Viper LTX,
Previous Sled(s): '13 Pro-R 800, '10 600 TNT Carb, '05 F6 Retro
Location: Fairfield, CT
Favorite Riding Area: VT & Lake George, NY
19-20 Mileage:
18-19 Mileage: 970
17-18 Mileage: 880
16-17 Mileage: 920
Age: 40
Riding Since: 1981
Default

I have a 136 x 1.35 Switchback and a 120 x 1 TNT. Pretty significant difference in deep snow performance. 2' get is nothing for a 136 x 1.35. I have gotten it stuck a few times in 36-40".

I don't notice a difference on the trails. I'll never go back to anything shorter than 136.
__________________
www.blackducklax.com
Peter King 28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2016, 10:21 AM   #7 (permalink)
Super Advanced Member
 
skidont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,474
Current Sled(s): 2015 1200 renegade
Previous Sled(s): ALOT !!
Location: North Branch , Mn
Favorite Riding Area: northern wis - northern Mn
19-20 Mileage:
18-19 Mileage: 3117
17-18 Mileage: 2066
16-17 Mileage: 1936
Age: 54
Riding Since: 1968
Default

I really like my 129 inch blizzard BUT when I put the 1 + 1 seat on for the boss it doesn't work as nice as the renegade , I am going back to the renegade
skidont is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:06 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.