QUOTE(Polaris Rider @ Jul 9 2008, 07:23 PM)

Try calling Dynoport. They told me before they have and will port a motor with the shim kit, keeping the shim kit. Their reasoning was because the heads are already set up for it. I asked about the transfers being too high and the response I got was the clutching would just have to be a little more spot on with the higher transfers.
Makes sense if the shim kit is already there. However, IMO (with all due respect to DynoPort), the height of the transfers in relation to the upper edge of the exhaust port has a definite effect on cylinder filling at any particular rpm. Too close together, and you may not get maximum airflow/hp from the engine at higher rpms. I'm sure there's a fine line between proper coordination of pipe length, diameters, port layout, exhaust valve opening/closing, jetting and ignition timing. And on this engine, Polaris has done a fine job with the stock configuration. There must be sufficient time to dissipate spent exhaust before opening the transfers or some of the exhaust gases find their way down the transfers and fresh charge is blocked. The opening of the exhaust port sufficiently ahead of the transfers enables a period of "blowdown" before the transfers open. Engines set up to run on the trail at lower peak rpms may not be hurt much by higher transfers (in fact, might be helped), but higher rpm race engines probably will be. Lowering the transfer ports (not raising them with a shim) helps in this case according to Flannery. Consequently, the combustion pressure can to be dissipated sufficiently to allow MAXIMUM transfer of incoming fresh charge from the crankcase to the combustion chamber. I'm of the opinion, based on successfully racing my stock ported/piped 800 XCR against many modified 800 XCRs, that Polaris knows exactly what they were doing to get the outstanding broad range stock performance from this engine.