QUOTE(Freakbrother69 @ Mar 11 2008, 10:24 PM)

^^^Dude, why are U in a yamaha forum ?
Because I think the Phazer is neat and wanted to see how they are doing.
QUOTE(ross040495 @ Mar 2 2008, 09:10 PM)

I have been thinking about getting a phazer or a tnt. I have a ski doo and it is a good sled but bad on gas. I like the 4 stroke motor in the phazer it seems like a good motor. But I am prety sure the tnt would be faster ….
The thread originator is trying to decide between a Phazer and a TNT; and
since I have actually ridden both, back-to-back, and spent a day riding with a Phazer owner, I thought that could offer an honest unbiased opinion. If one actually reads my posts, you see that I’m am not a “Yamaha sux cuz I rides Doo” type of poster.
QUOTE(Trail Ryder @ Mar 10 2008, 01:14 PM)

I own a TNT and I've ridden a 2008 Phazer RTX. 2 weeks ago, I rode all day with another TNT, a '04 MXZX 600, and a '08 Phazer.
Personally, I find the Phazer to be really neat, fun, and torquey ... a meld between a sled and sport ATV. Performance-wise it competes with the SkiDoo REV 550 X. In the categories of weight, handling, acceleration, top speed, and bump performance, it does not compete with the TNT. Sorry.
Phazer Pros:
- Unique
- Acceptable Bump Performance
- Good on the tight and twisty stuff
- Great Fuel Economy
- Torquey
Phazer Cons:
- Poor Wind Protection
- A little tippy
- Lack of Storage Options
- Won't hang with similiarly priced machines
- Easy for tool pouch to get wet and freeze
- A little heavy to start with and then gains a lot of weight through-out the day due to snow and ice build up
Throughout the day, the Phazer owner had it wide open and stated that the Phazer could just not hang with the 600 liquids (and it shouldn't, as cost about $1,000 cheaper than the TNTs), and once conditions got bumpy, the gap got greater. The TNTs were getting about 17 MPG, the 600 HO was getting about 11 MPG, and the Phazer got at least 19 MPG. We did some switching around and when the Phazer owner rode a e-start TNT (mine is pull-start only), he was blown away with the light weight, handling, and acceleration of the TNT.
QUOTE(Weapon x @ Mar 10 2008, 09:14 PM)

Thats all good trail but its too bad the tnt handles like crap
Umm, OK; too bad all of the snowmobile reviewers disagree with you.
QUOTE(natty793 @ Mar 10 2008, 09:45 PM)

So you are saying the Phazer performance compares to a 550 Fan Cooled sled???? Are you serious??

QUOTE(Trail Ryder @ Mar 11 2008, 09:21 AM)

First of all, I'm not bashing the Phazer. I think it is a cool sled and I'm glad that Yamaha came out with this new direction.
Well, I think the Phazer may have initial grunt out of the hole, but my opinion is the lighter REV Fan will catch up especially if on fresh, deeper snow.
Also, I'm NOT comparing the Phazer to all fan-cooled sleds, just REV 550 fan as it is the lightest fan-cooled sled and the stock Rotax fan (in the REV chassis) easily exceeds 68 HP on any dyno run that I've seen.
Lets compare power-to-weight ratios:
TNT, >399 lbs. dry, 110 HP, Ratio = 3.6:1
REV 550X, 435 lbs. dry, 70 HP, Ratio = 6.2:1
Phazer RTX, 489 lbs. dry, 80 HP, Ratio = 6.1:1
So, IMHO, the Phazer is not comparable to the TNT, but rather the 550X.
The TNT handles like crap? Are you serious? Have you ridden one???
All I can say is that I've ridden the Phazer RTX and a TNT, back-to-back on the same trail, minutes apart. I'm sorry but the TNT blows the Phazer away in performance and handling. The Phazer owner that tried the TNT made same statement, but he still like his Phazer and so do I, but performance-wise the Phazer is NOT comparable to the significantly lighter and more powerful TNT.
QUOTE(Trail Ryder @ Mar 11 2008, 11:07 AM)

If you get a chance, ride one! You will be impressed ... especially if the going gets rough or for off trail work. The float of even the short track XPs is impressive.
Wow, that is the first I've "heard" of any chassis failures.
Did they "fold" from normal use? Or were they tossed over a cliff? SkiDoo claims that the XP is 37% stronger than the REV. And based on this thread:
http://www.hardcoresledder.com/forums/inde...howtopic=298386those who actually own XPs, and have had impacts, are fairly impressed with the durability of the XPs.
Granted the XPs are not without their issues, but the TNTs (similar price point to the Phazer) have been fairly bullet proof. In fact, the Phazer we rode with, lost an idler wheel on it's first ride. The dealer replace it for free. And it failed not due to a design flaw, but a mis-assembled suspension spring which was easily fixed.
But no, wait ... the Yamaha Phazer is the best and fastest sled EVER MADE. When following one with my TNT, I just can't keep up with the heavier 80 HP Yamaha. I haven't had my TNT back to the dealer yet after nearly 1,900 trouble free Tug Hill miles, but I'm sure that it will spontaneously disintegrate any day now. Happy?
We should all ride the same brand, so that there will be no competition and then price will drop.