QUOTE(rjd75 @ Jun 20 2008, 10:04 AM)

Personally, I think they got away pretty easy considering what happened here.. The MOL just made an example of them for all the other clubs to get their shit together and realize the need to have some policies and procedures in place. I would be pretty happy with the outcome if I were in their shoes... Could have been MUCH worse..
-R.
Maybe so, but what this case has really done is bring to light some problems with the current laws that exist. If an entire provincial organization with well over 250 seperate incorporated entities was not aware of the legislation and the ramifications that it can have on us all than there has been a serious lack of communication on the governments behalf in informing the directors of not for profit corporations of the burden being placed on them. You can say ignorance is no excuse, but far too many pople were misinformed or not informed of this legislation. Being the president of one of these not for profit corporations I can tell you that you pour your heart and soul into making it run and in many instances it is not an easy task. The last thing any of our volunteers have time for is complying with all of the necessary paperwork needed to cover your ass should such a unfortunate incident occur. I also know that many of the so called employees of the OFSC's snowmobile clubs and grooming associations are more or less a paid volunteer. It's more of an honorarium than a wage in most instances. Many run their own businesses or are retired and the small wages they collect more or less just cover their costs to volunteer. Would the victim in this incident really want to see the Parry Sound Snowmobile Organization being fined? I know if it was me that died I sure wouldn't want to see my club or any of our volunteers being dragged through the BS that the group in Parry Sound has endured. Will this case change the way the OFSC operates? Yes, many organizations ourselves included have already started in implemeting a plan. Will it cause more volunteer burnout and hurt our ability to deliver a quality product. Yes it certainly will. In Pary Sounds case they have $30,000 less to put on the trail. They'll have to make cuts somewhere to pay for that. My guess is the groomer does a little less grooming next season. In our clubs case the policies already existed which should be enough, but in todays litigious society we now need more and more paperwork to prove that we are following the law. So you have someone that volunteers their time to help out and instead of thanking them when they show up to help, you have to shove a pile of paperwork in front of their face and have the hard lined attitude that they are signing or not helping with the days work. Did you know that you have to have regular sign offs from all of your volunteers that has them signing that they have took training and agree to follow safe work practices? Did you know that every club needs to have a standard operating policy in writing to explain the proper way to complete every task a volunteer or employee may undertake. That's right a policy to fuel the groomer, a policy to install a sign post, a policy to run a welder, a policy to drive a half ton to get parts, a policy to run a barbecue at the clubs barbecue, a policy to run a chain saw, a policy to sweep the garage floor at the clubs groomer shed, a policy to change a light bulb, a policy to operate a computer, a policy to work at a trade show booth, a policy to operate carpentry tools to build an outhouse, etc, etc, etc. When does it end? It's not fair to myself as a director of the organization. I'm not making any money at this and the law needs to recognize this. I can see the need for the law and all of the paperwork in large businesses, but it isn't reasonable in a small business or non-profit organization with limited resources. Safety should be a top priority of everyone's, but creating a mile long paper trail to prove you have done so is a pain in the ass and shouldn't be necessary. Lawyers are ruining our scoiety and the government is giving them the laws to do so.