To bill the hiker in this case really is not about recouping the total costs of the operation, but instead should serve as a deterrent to such stupid behavior in the future.
Just like the fines handed out by Fish & Game officers (and all other law enforcement agencies in the State, for that matter) never cover the true cost of the actual enforcement, but are put in place and based on the hope to minimize future infractions.
By continually being involved in these types of rescues and never holding the negligent responsible, the State only encourages the foolish behavior to continue.
Fish & Game cannot continue to cry poverty because of these type of operations while continually looking the other way when it comes to holding these individuals responsible.
Finally, let me make it clear that I do not blame or hold responsible the Conservation Officer out in the field for these types of decisions. These officers are put in impossible situations on a daily basis with little recognition or understanding of the perils they face. Rather these political decisions are being made by career political appointees in Concord that, quite frankly, are out of touch with what is actually going on out in the field.
Just my $.02